Skip to content
Vulnerability accountability platform

Every vuln has an asset. Every asset gets an owner.

Security stops owning risk it can't fix. Every scanner finding lands on a named human — the one who can actually patch.

Get a demoSee it in action →
What changes for you
For CISOs

One number for the board.

Program risk you can defend, not a 32k-row CSV. Attainment, KEV exposure, and per-BU rollups in one view.

For platform leads

One ticket per CVE, not 247.

The engine groups affected hosts by owner. Each owner sees their ~200, with SLAs you actually negotiated.

For sec ops

Stop owning risk you can't patch.

Every finding lands on a named human with a clock. The handoff happens — and shows up in the audit log.
The CTEM mobilization gap

Every VM tool ships you to stage 4. Mobilization is where they leave you.

Gartner's CTEM defines five stages — and every legacy scanner stops one stage short. Stage 5 is where vulnerabilities meet a named human with an SLA. Without it, findings pile up in a shared inbox and stay open.

CTEM lifecycle · legacy VM coverage
01Scopingscanner coverage defined
02Discovery11.2M findings ingested
03PrioritizationCVSS + EPSS scored
04Validationexploit checks partial
05Mobilizationno named owner · stuck
Why mobilization fails · 5 structural gaps
G-01No asset owner of record
Security inherits every host that lacks a named human. They own risk they cannot patch.87% of findingsland on sec team
G-02SLA defined, but not tracked at scale
Spreadsheet SLAs break the moment a patch waits on infra, app, or change windows. No automation flags the dependency.0.1%SLA compliance
G-03No escalation past the ticket
Ticket bounces between IT / app team / cloud — no one closes the loop, nothing escalates to a manager.14.2 daysmedian bounce
G-04Hierarchy collapses into a queue
Director and CISO get a CSV of 32k overdue rows — not a rollup of who's blocking which team this week.1shared inbox
G-05No program-level VM insights
Per-team MTTR, breach-risk trend, top blockers, accountability rollups — none of it surfaces. Just raw counts.0live KPIs
↓ZeroInSec is built for stage 5 — see how, below.
How it works

Signals in. Owned remediation out.

Every finding from every scanner is fused with your asset truth, prioritized, and cascaded from a named owner up to the CISO view — with SLAs the org can defend.

Scanners04 connectedQualysVMDRTenableVMWizCNAPPCrowdStrikeEDRAsset sources04 connectedCMDBServiceNowIPAMInfobloxActive Dir.IdentityCloud tagsAWS · AzureZEROINSEC ENGINESeverity weightCVSS · EPSS · KEVOwnership graphCMDB · IdP · team mapSLA & escalation7 / 14 / 30 d → esc.Asset coverage gapsunscanned · stale · orphanOwnera.bishop · platform1 of 50SLA 7dTeam leadPlatform Engineering12 owners94% on-timeBusiness unitDigital · Retail5 teams88% on-timeCISO · C-levelFull program viewAll BUs32,449 opencascades up
CriticalHighMediumLow
10,000 vulnerabilities · 30-day closure simulation

One queue stalls. Fifty owners closes the queue.

DAY 00 / 30
Without ownership
One pile. No accountable name. Closure stalls.
10,000 open
0 closed · 0%
With ZeroInSec ownership
Routed across 50 owners → teams → BUs → CISO.
10,000 open
0 closed · 0%
≈ 200
per owner
50
named owners
92%
closed in 30 days
7d
avg SLA · critical
  • Admin / owner — sees only their ~200, with personal SLAs.
  • Team lead — sees 12 owners and per-team breach risk.
  • Business unit — sees 5 teams rolled up by criticality.
  • CISO / C-level — sees the whole program in one number.
One vulnerability · its journey

From one CVE to a program-level signal. Without anyone chasing.

A real CVE rarely hits one asset. It hits hundreds, across many owners. Watch one move from drop to closed — and see exactly what each tier of the org receives along the way.

CRITCVE-2024-3094xz-utils backdoor247assets affected→14named owners
  1. T+0
    Routed
    Owners14 named owners · 0 unowned
    247hosts open
    OWNER TICKET · Jira
    a.bishop · Platform / SRE
    12 hosts · SLA 7d
    → patch via KB-2024-3094
    Engine fans the CVE to every affected host, then groups by owner. One ticket per person, not 247.
  2. T+5d
    Nudge
    Owners11 patched · 3 stalled
    142hosts open
    SLACK NUDGE · in-channel
    @a.bishop
    2 days until SLA breach
    12 hosts remaining
    Reminder fires inside the owner's own Slack/Teams — never as a sec-team escalation.
  3. T+7d
    1st miss
    Team Lead3 leads notified
    32hosts open
    WEEKLY DIGEST · team lead
    Platform Eng — 94% on-time
    3 owners over SLA
    → 12 hosts blocking
    Only the owners who missed cascade up. Team lead sees who's blocking — not a 32k-row CSV.
  4. T+14d
    2nd miss
    Business UnitDigital · Retail
    8hosts open
    BU ROLLUP · monthly
    Retail · 88% on-time
    ↘ −4 pts vs Q3
    Top blocker: legacy DB
    Patterns surface: which team consistently misses, which assets keep breaching SLA.
  5. T+30d
    Program risk
    CISOC-level view
    2hosts open
    PROGRAM DASHBOARD
    KEV exposure: 2 hosts
    Org MTTR 11.4d (target 14)
    1 BU below target
    Only the signal the CISO needs: program health, KEV exposure, attainment against target.
Asset Owner Suggestion Engine

Name an owner for every asset — even the ones your CMDB forgot.

Most tools report unowned servers and network gear and leave you to chase them. The unowned queue is the killer of every infrastructure vulnerability program. We close it.

ZeroInSec fuses six signals — CMDB, AD groups, IPAM subnets, DHCP scopes, patch-system owners, and on-call schedules — into a probabilistic owner score, then assigns.

Tuned for infrastructure — servers, network devices, hypervisors, storage.

  • 6 signal sources fused per host — not just CMDB.
  • Confidence score on every suggestion, with the reasons exposed for audit.
  • Auto-reroute when an owner leaves, changes team, or fails SLA — no orphans.
Suggest owner · erdc-bgios.acme.com3 candidates · model v4.2
a.bishop
Platform / Core SRE
94
  • CMDB primary contact
  • AD: PlatformEng group
  • IPAM subnet owner 10.4.0/22
  • Patch jobs: 412 / 90d
✓ Suggested · auto-assign in 24h
r.okafor
Platform / Core SRE
71
  • AD: PlatformEng group
  • On-call rotation: Tue
  • Last login 12d
m.tanaka
Network / Edge
42
  • IPAM VLAN co-owner
  • Ticket assignee 4 / 90d
CMDB gaps closed this week87 of 87
HostWhy unownedSourceSuggested
bmz-edge-04.acme.comCMDB owner field emptyIPAM + AD groupk.alvarez
erdc-bgios.acme.comOwner left company 112d agoAD lifecyclea.bishop
sw-core-eu-09.acme.comNetwork device, no CMDB rowIPAM + DHCP scopem.tanaka
db-eu-prod-12.acme.comCMDB stale > 180dPatch system ownerj.silva
Assignment rules · suggestion_sources registry
23 sources · 8 categories · all registered via @register_source
Same /24 Subnetw 1.00
subnet_24 · min_matches 3 · max conf 95%
4 of 5 in 10.50.23.0/24 owned by John
Same /16 Subnetw 0.70
subnet_16 · min_matches 5 · max conf 85%
Broader fallback when /24 sparse
Adjacent IPs (±5)w 0.90
adjacent_ip · min_matches 2 · max conf 90%
10.50.23.150–.154 same owner
Hierarchy Matchw 0.90
hierarchy_match · min_matches 2 · max conf 88%
Department=Finance owns 14 assets
Scanner Tag/Groupw 0.70
scanner_tag · min_matches 3 · max conf 78%
'Production Network' group
Asset Type Matchw 0.75
asset_type_match · min_matches 3 · max conf 80%
asset_type=Database Server
Criticality Matchw 0.65
criticality_match · min_matches 3 · max conf 75%
Tier 1 / Critical assets
Every source ships with editable weight, min_confidence, and min_matches in SuggestionConfig — kill-switch any source per tenant. Suggestions aggregate via suggestion_aggregator; multi-source matches rank higher. Auto-assign fires at ≥ 0.95 confidence after constraint validation.
Why this is the differentiator

Other tools find the gap. ZeroInSec closes it.

ToolOwnership modelBehavior on gapsvs. ZeroInSec
QualysTag-based · manualReports unowned, doesn't fixSuggests + assigns
TenableAsset tags · importedInherits CMDB gaps as-isCloses CMDB gaps
ServiceNowCMDB record onlyStale if CMDB staleCross-source fusion
BrinqaRules engine · you writeNeeds hand-tuned rulesSuggested out of box
ZeroInSecMulti-source fusion + ML confidence scoreAuto-closes via Suggestion Engine—
Four-step loop

Close the ownership gap, then the vulnerability gap.

01

Identify

One canonical record per asset, deduplicated across Qualys, Tenable, Wiz, CrowdStrike, CMDB, and tickets.

02

Prioritize

Severity × asset criticality × exploit signal (KEV, EPSS). Not a CVSS leaderboard.

03

Assign

Asset Owner Suggestion Engine reads CMDB, AD, cloud tags, and commit history to name a human for every host. No asset left unowned.

04

Drive

SLA clocks, escalations, and approvals keep the queue moving — and cascade visibility from owner up to CISO.
Operations console

Run remediation like an incident bridge.

Every finding lands with an asset, an owner, and a clock. When the clock breaks SLA, the right engineering team gets paged — not the security inbox.

  • Hierarchy-aware ownership across business units, environments, and regions.
  • SLA matrix tuned by severity × asset criticality, not a single 30-day rule.
  • Approvals for SLA extensions, risk acceptance, and status changes — with audit trail.
Example · vulnerabilities by SLA pressure5 of 32,489
VulnerabilityAssetSevSLAOwner
XZ Utils backdoor — sshd auth bypassCVE-2024-3094
erdc-bgios.acme.comcritical+147dUnowned
OpenSSH regreSSHion — pre-auth RCECVE-2024-6387
erdc-bgios.acme.comcritical+112dSRE / Core
FortiOS SSL VPN out-of-bounds writeCVE-2024-21762
bmz-edge.acme.comhigh+96dPlatform / Edge
Zimbra postjournal — unauthenticated RCECVE-2024-45519
bmz-edge.acme.commedium+34dPlatform / Edge
Apache Struts file upload path traversalCVE-2023-50164
app-api.acme.comlow-3dApp / API
30-minute walkthrough

Mobilize remediation. Set accountability that sticks.

Connect a scanner and ZeroInSec routes every finding to a named owner, with SLAs the org can actually defend.

Get a demo